Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource EMDR Collection Journal Document # emdr_doc_ID 02956 Author(s) dc_creator Robert B. Welch Year emdr_year 1996 Link to Document (e.g. DOI, PDF) emdr_title_link <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(96)00013-4">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(96)00013-4</a> Link to Source (e.g. Association, Publisher) emdr_source_link http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-behavior-therapy-and-experimental-psychiatry/ Subjects emdr_subject Comment, Letter, Professional Criticism, Reply Accuracy Verified? emdr_accuracy Yes Archived emdr_archived Yes Original Work Citation spec_citation Welch, R. B. (1996, June). <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(96)00013-4">On the origin of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: A response to Rosen.</a> Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27(2), 175-179. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(96)00013-4 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource On the origin of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: A response to Rosen Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27(2), 175-179. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(96)00013-4 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996, June Language A language of the resource English Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource Journal Description An account of the resource Rosen argues that the eye movements experienced by Shapiro during the incident leading to her development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) could not, as she later inferred, have been saccadic. The present author disputes Rosen's conclusion by showing that his arguments are based on a faulty understanding of the nature of saccadic eye movements or are irrelevant to Shapiro's claim. Comment Letter Professional Criticism Reply