Treating implicit trauma: A quasi-experimental study comparing the EMDR therapy standard protocol with a 'blind 2 therapist' version: Trauma capacity building project in Northern Iraq
Description
Background
Psychological trauma is a silent epidemic which presents as a global public health issue, often in the form of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). EMDR Therapy is an empirically supported treatment intervention for PTSD and has been used as part of trauma-capacity building, particularly in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). For some survivor’s their trauma experiences cannot be spoken of: they may be alluded to, suggested, and though not directly expressed. There are several factors as to why these implicit traumas experiences are ‘unspoken’, for example when the trauma involves a deep-rooted sense of shame or guilt, a distorted sense of over-responsibility or when to speak of the trauma engenders fear of retribution, reprisal and consequence.
Aims
This poster presentation will explore the effectiveness of using two protocol variations of EMDR Therapy – Standard versus a ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ protocol version as part of a quasi-experimental study which took place in Northern Iraq. Method: The study contains two projects and subsequently tested several hypotheses regarding safety, effectiveness, efficiency and relevance of the ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ protocol within EMDR Therapy.
Results & Conclusion
Results indicated support for the B2T protocol intervention with various trauma populations including Yezidi survivors of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) – also known as Daesh. It also demonstrated that B2T was safe, effective, efficient and relevant within LMIC’s and Humanitarian settings.
Psychological trauma is a silent epidemic which presents as a global public health issue, often in the form of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). EMDR Therapy is an empirically supported treatment intervention for PTSD and has been used as part of trauma-capacity building, particularly in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). For some survivor’s their trauma experiences cannot be spoken of: they may be alluded to, suggested, and though not directly expressed. There are several factors as to why these implicit traumas experiences are ‘unspoken’, for example when the trauma involves a deep-rooted sense of shame or guilt, a distorted sense of over-responsibility or when to speak of the trauma engenders fear of retribution, reprisal and consequence.
Aims
This poster presentation will explore the effectiveness of using two protocol variations of EMDR Therapy – Standard versus a ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ protocol version as part of a quasi-experimental study which took place in Northern Iraq. Method: The study contains two projects and subsequently tested several hypotheses regarding safety, effectiveness, efficiency and relevance of the ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ protocol within EMDR Therapy.
Results & Conclusion
Results indicated support for the B2T protocol intervention with various trauma populations including Yezidi survivors of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) – also known as Daesh. It also demonstrated that B2T was safe, effective, efficient and relevant within LMIC’s and Humanitarian settings.
Format
Conference
Language
English
Original Work Citation
Farrell, D. (2021, June). Treating implicit trauma: A quasi-experimental study comparing the EMDR therapy standard protocol with a 'blind 2 therapist' version: Trauma capacity building project in Northern Iraq. Poster presented at the 20th EMDR Europe Association Conference, Virtual
Citation
“Treating implicit trauma: A quasi-experimental study comparing the EMDR therapy standard protocol with a 'blind 2 therapist' version: Trauma capacity building project in Northern Iraq,” Francine Shapiro Library, accessed May 8, 2024, https://francineshapirolibrary.omeka.net/items/show/26929.