Cancer et thérapie EMDR : contribution ! Cancer and EMDR therapy: Contribution!
Description
Nous avons fait le choix de ne traiter que les aspects les plus importants de la détresse psychique particulière, consécutive à la survenue de la pathologie cancéreuse, en envisageant la problématique de la dépression et des troubles anxieux. Nous n’avons pas souhaité traiter la question du trouble de stress post-traumatique qui ne nous semble pas suffisamment heuristique dans le champ de la psychopathologie du cancer. En effet, dans sa phénoménologie il se distingue du TSPT classique. Une des premières questions est notamment de savoir ce qui fait trauma dans le cancer (annonce, rechute, début des traitements… ?). Étant donné la complexité des phénomènes et leurs enchevêtrements, la réponse reste complexe. Un autre aspect à prendre en considération est celui des stresseurs qui ne sont pas délimités dans le temps comme pour un TSPT classique, pour lequel le plus souvent le choc traumatique appartient au passé de la victime. Avec le cancer les choses s’accumulent les unes aux autres au fil des évolutions et des involutions de la maladie. L’espoir fait souvent place à la peur et au pessimisme. Tous les signes corporels, ainsi que les moindres changements d’attitudes du corps médical sont scrutés et interprétés. Enfin, une autre différence par rapport au TSPT classique, c’est qu’ici aucune stratégie d’évitement n’est envisageable car pour s’en sortir il faut chaque jour se confronter au réel de la maladie et des traitements, mais également à un futur incertain et anxiogène. Il ne s’agit en rien de réduire ou de minimiser la problématique des troubles rencontrés la plupart du temps en psychotraumatologie ou dans les autres pathologies, mais il est important de prendre la mesure de toute la spécificité des bouleversements psychopathologiques qu’impose une maladie comme le cancer…
We have chosen to treat only the most important aspects of the particular psychological distress, following the occurrence of the cancerous pathology, by considering the problem of depression and anxiety disorders. We did not wish to address the issue of post-traumatic stress disorder which does not seem to us to be sufficiently heuristic in the field of cancer psychopathology. Indeed, in its phenomenology it is distinct from classic PTSD. One of the first questions is to know what causes trauma in cancer (disclosure, relapse, start of treatments, etc.?). Given the complexity of the phenomena and their entanglements, the answer remains complex. Another aspect to take into consideration is that of stressors which are not limited in time as for classic PTSD, for which most often the traumatic shock belongs to the victim's past. With cancer, things pile up on top of each other as the disease evolves and changes. Hope often gives way to fear and pessimism. All bodily signs, as well as the slightest changes in attitude of the medical profession are scrutinized and interpreted. Finally, another difference compared to classic PTSD is that here no avoidance strategy is possible because to get out of it you have to confront the reality of the illness and the treatments every day, but also with an uncertain and anxiety-provoking future. It is in no way a question of reducing or minimizing the problem of disorders encountered most of the time in psychotraumatology or in other pathologies, but it is important to take into account the full specificity of the psychopathological upheavals imposed by an illness like the cancer…
We have chosen to treat only the most important aspects of the particular psychological distress, following the occurrence of the cancerous pathology, by considering the problem of depression and anxiety disorders. We did not wish to address the issue of post-traumatic stress disorder which does not seem to us to be sufficiently heuristic in the field of cancer psychopathology. Indeed, in its phenomenology it is distinct from classic PTSD. One of the first questions is to know what causes trauma in cancer (disclosure, relapse, start of treatments, etc.?). Given the complexity of the phenomena and their entanglements, the answer remains complex. Another aspect to take into consideration is that of stressors which are not limited in time as for classic PTSD, for which most often the traumatic shock belongs to the victim's past. With cancer, things pile up on top of each other as the disease evolves and changes. Hope often gives way to fear and pessimism. All bodily signs, as well as the slightest changes in attitude of the medical profession are scrutinized and interpreted. Finally, another difference compared to classic PTSD is that here no avoidance strategy is possible because to get out of it you have to confront the reality of the illness and the treatments every day, but also with an uncertain and anxiety-provoking future. It is in no way a question of reducing or minimizing the problem of disorders encountered most of the time in psychotraumatology or in other pathologies, but it is important to take into account the full specificity of the psychopathological upheavals imposed by an illness like the cancer…
Format
Book Section
Language
French
Original Work Citation
Tarquinio, C., Tarquinio, P., Zimmermann, E., & Vismara, L. (2022). [Cancer and EMDR therapy: Contribution!]. In Tarquinio, C., Zimmermann, E., Brennstuhl M.-J., Ludwig, C., Dellucci, D., Iracane-Cost, M., Piedfort-Marin, O., Rydberg. J. A., Silvestre, M., & Tarquinio, P. (Eds.), Pratique de la psychothérapie EMDR, 2nd Edition (pp. 764-774). Paris: Dunod. French
Collection
Citation
“Cancer et thérapie EMDR : contribution ! Cancer and EMDR therapy: Contribution!,” Francine Shapiro Legacy Library, accessed December 17, 2025, https://francineshapirolibrary.omeka.net/items/show/28981.

